Professional Network Engagement Boost: Female Professionals Find Success When Pretending to be Men
Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?
If not, the reason might be your gender.
The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility
Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.
Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.
Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up
The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.
Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.
Company Statement
Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.
"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.
Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.
The Method
- First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
- Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
- Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language
The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.
The Negative Aspect
Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.
"Before, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."
She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became more frustrated."
Mixed Results
Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.
"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.
Wider Consequences
These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.
Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.
System Details
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.
Changing Landscape
As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."